1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 537 P.2d
  5. 537 P.2d 130 (1975)
 

STATE v. WRIGHT

537 P.2d 130 (1975)

STATE of Oregon, Respondent, v. Robert Junior WRIGHT, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided June 16, 1975.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jon S. Henricksen, Oregon City, argued the cause for appellant. On the brief were Thom & Henricksen and Ronald D. Thom, Oregon City.

W. Michael Gillette, Sol. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Lee Johnson, Atty. Gen., Salem.

Before SCHWAB, C.J., and FORT and LEE, JJ.

LEE, Judge.

Defendant-bartender paid cash for "free games" won on an electric amusement device and was convicted of promoting gambling in the second degree, ORS 167.122.1 Defendant contends that the trial court erred in: (1) denying his motion for a directed verdict of acquittal; (2) overruling his motion to suppress evidence; and (3) finding that the gambling device was subject to forfeiture and destruction under ORS 167.162. We affirm...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases