1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 537 P.2d
  5. 537 P.2d 126 (1975)
 

McKINNEY v. EMPLOYMENT DIVISION

537 P.2d 126 (1975)

Claims of Marva D. McKinney et al. Marva D. McKinney et al., Petitioners, v. EMPLOYMENT DIVISION et al., Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided June 23, 1975.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Dan O'Leary, Portland, argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the brief were Pozzi, Wilson & Atchison and Jan Thomas Baisch, Portland.

James H. Gidley, Portland, argued the cause for respondent Nabisco Incorporated. With him on the brief were Cosgrave & Kester, Portland.

No appearance by respondent Employment Division.

Before LANGTRY, P.J., and FOLEY and THORNTON, JJ.

LANGTRY, Presiding Judge.

Members of the Bakery and Confectionery Workers Union, Local No. 364, and the Operating Engineers Union, Local No. 87, have brought this consolidated appeal from decisions of the Employment Appeals Board denying them benefits for a nine-week period spanning the summer of 1974 during which time they were unemployed as the result of a labor dispute involving their employer — Nabisco Incorporated — and Lodge 63, International Association...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases