HEDRICK, Judge.
By their one assignment of error, plaintiffs contend the court erred in concluding that they have no direct access to the "ramp" constructed on the right-of-way abutting their property.
Since plaintiffs' two lots were a part of a larger undivided tract of land when John M. Davis and his wife granted the right-of-way to the defendant over which the ramp was constructed, plaintiffs' rights of access to the ramp, if any, obviously are controlled...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
