UPTON v. TATRO

No. 368.

68 Wis.2d 562 (1975)

229 N. W. 2d 691

UPTON, by Guardian ad litem, and another, Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. TATRO, Defendant: RURAL MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant and Appellant.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

Decided June 3, 1975.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant the cause was submitted on the brief of Terwilliger, Wakeen, Piehler, Conway & Rouse, S. C. of Wausau, attorneys, and Douglas J. Klingberg and Thomas N. Akey of Wausau, of counsel; and for the plaintiff-respondents the cause was submitted on the brief of Schmitt, Nolan & Hansen of Merrill.


Submitted under sec. (Rule) 251.54 February 5, 1975.

DAY, J.

The principal question on this appeal is the same as that raised in the case of Nordahl v. Peterson, ante, p. 538, 229 N.W.2d 682. Is consent by the title-holder and named insured to operate a motor vehicle implied where such consent is given by one who, for all practical purposes, is the owner of the vehicle and has such permission from the named insured...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases