1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 212 S.E.2d
  5. 212 S.E.2d 403 (1975)
 

LOFLIN v. LOFLIN

No. 7419DC1005.

212 S.E.2d 403 (1975)

25 N.C. App. 103

Drema Diana Howard LOFLIN v. Ricky Walter LOFLIN.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

March 5, 1975.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ottway Burton, Asheboro, for plaintiff.

Bell, Ogburn & Redding by Deane F. Bell, Asheboro, for defendant.

BROCK, Chief Judge.

In order for a spouse to be entitled to alimony, alimony pendente lite, or counsel fees, that spouse must be a dependent spouse. Little v. Little, 18 N.C. App. 311, 196 S.E.2d 562 (1973). The burden of proving dependency is upon the spouse asserting the claim for alimony or alimony pendente lite. Under G.S. § 50-16.1(3) the dependency of the spouse asserting...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases