1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 526 F.2d
  5. 526 F.2d 86 (1975)
 

WM. INGLIS & SONS BAKING CO. v. ITT CONT. BAKING CO., INC.

No. 75-1570.

526 F.2d 86 (1975)

WILLIAM INGLIS & SONS BAKING CO., a corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ITT CONTINENTAL BAKING CO., INC., et al., Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Rehearing and Rehearing Denied March 12, 1976.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Eugene C. Crew (argued), of Broad, Khourie & Schultz, Professional Corp., San Francisco, Cal., for plaintiff-appellant.

Charles E. Buffon (argued), of Covington & Burling, Washington, D.C., John T. Cusack (argued), of Gardner, Carton & Douglas, Chicago, Ill., Richard J. Archer (argued), of Sullivan, Jones & Archer, San Francisco, Cal., for defendants-appellees.

Before BROWNING and CHOY, Circuit Judges, and SKOPIL, District Judge.

Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied March 12, 1976.

OPINION

SKOPIL, District Judge:

In 1971 William Inglis & Sons Baking Co. (Inglis) and four other wholesale baking companies filed this antitrust action against various competitors within relevant geographic markets in Washington, Oregon, and California. The complaint charged violations of §§ 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1 and 2; § 2(a) of the Robinson...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases