JOY v. RALEY

No. 1 CA-CIV 2610.

24 Ariz. App. 584 (1975)

540 P.2d 710

George Joseph JOY and Jo Joy, husband and wife, Appellants, v. Jay M. RALEY, a minor, by his father and guardian ad litem, John N. Raley, and John N. Raley, Appellees.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department A.

October 2, 1975.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bradshaw & Benesch by Wayne C. Benesch, Yuma, for appellants.

Rees, Mercaldo & Smith, P.C. by Paul G. Rees, Jr., Tucson, for appellees.


OPINION

FROEB, Judge.

In this negligence action, the jury returned a verdict in favor of the defendants (appellants). The trial court thereafter granted the motion of the plaintiffs (appellees) for a new trial on the ground that the verdict was not justified by the evidence. 16 A.R.S. Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 59(a)(8). The motion and order of the trial court were in compliance with Rule 59.

On review, we adhere to the rule that the burden is...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases