ROJAS v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INS. CO.

No. 73-3535.

518 F.2d 85 (1975)

Minervino A. ROJAS, Sr. and Maria P. Rojas, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY et al., Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

June 9, 1975.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Nathaniel J. Friedman, Los Angeles, Cal. (argued), for plaintiffs-appellants.

James R. Hammerton, Santa Ana, Cal. (argued), for defendants-appellees.

Before WRIGHT and GOODWIN, Circuit Judges, and EAST, Senior District Judge.


OPINION

EAST, Senior District Judge:

In this diversity case regarding the duty of an insurance company to timely settle the claims of its policy-holders, the Rojases appeal the judgment of the District Court in favor of the defendant State Farm based upon jury verdicts. We affirm.

Rojas was the holder of a State Farm auto insurance policy insuring him and members of his family, among other coverages, against loss caused by collision with uninsured...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases