BRITT, Judge.
By their first assignment of error, plaintiffs contend the trial court erred in excluding testimony tending to show the vicious propensity of defendants' dog approximately four weeks subsequent to the date on which the minor plaintiff was bitten. The assignment has merit.
In the trial of this action, it was proper, if not necessary, for plaintiffs to show that defendants' dog was "dangerous, vicious, mischievous, or ferocious, or one termed in...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
