Special Term remanded for recalculation only to the extent that the percentage increase allowed for projected future costs relied on the 6% limit imposed by the Economic Stabilization Act of 1970, without amplifying whether that limitation in the rate schedule was "reasonably related to the costs of efficient production" (Public Health Law, § 2807, subd 3). The dissent would further remand the calculation of the "community service factor" as well. We have dealt with...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.