The respondent was admitted to practice by this court on December 18, 1967. Five charges of professional misconduct were alleged against the respondent as follows: (a) The respondent pled guilty to the crime of tampering with a witness, a class A misdemeanor (Penal Law, § 215.10). (b) The respondent failed to institute an action for divorce on behalf of a client after accepting a fee for the institution...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.