1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 69 Wis.2d
  5. 69 Wis.2d 481 (1975)
 

STATE v. GROH

No. State 31.

69 Wis.2d 481 (1975)

230 N.W.2d 745

STATE, Respondent, v. GROH, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

Decided June 30, 1975.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there were briefs by James M. Shellow, Stephen M. Glynn and Shellow & Shellow, all of Milwaukee, and oral argument by Mr. Glynn.

For the respondent the cause was argued by David J. Becker, assistant attorney general, with whom on the brief was Bronson C. La Follette, attorney general.

HANLEY, J.

Three issues are presented upon this appeal:

1. Was there error as to compliance with the rule which recognizes the right of a defendant to inspect statements previously made to authorities by witnesses called to testify on behalf of the state?

2. Did the trial court unduly restrict the defense counsel's closing argument?

3. Did the trial court unduly restrict the defendant's cross-examination of Leslie Pedersen?

Production...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases