PER CURIAM.
Defendant contends on this appeal from judgment of conviction that the prosecution which resulted in his conviction of driving with .10 percent or more by weight of alcohol in his blood, Minn.St. 169.121, subd. 1(d), was barred by the double jeopardy provisions of the United States and Minnesota Constitutions. Defendant bases this contention upon the fact that the first trial on this charge (along with a charge of driving
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.