1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 66 N.J.
  5. 66 N.J. 476 (1975)
 

IN RE BOARD'S INVESTIGATION OF TELE. COS.

66 N.J. 476 (1975)

333 A.2d 4

IN THE MATTER OF THE BOARD'S INVESTIGATION OF TELEPHONE COMPANIES PROVIDING INTRASTATE SERVICE IN NEW JERSEY OF A PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE ADJUSTMENT CLAUSE. RATE COUNSEL, APPELLANT, v. NEW JERSEY BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY AND THE BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSIONERS OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, RESPONDENT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided February 10, 1975.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. John G. Graham argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. William E. McGlynn, Jack B. Kirsten and John G. Graham, Rate Counsel, Department of Public Advocate, attorneys).

Mr. Michael J. O'Neil argued the cause for respondent, New Jersey Bell Telephone Company (Messrs. Michael J. O'Neil and Richard C. Schramm, attorneys).

The opinion of the Court was delivered by HUGHES, C.J.

This appeal, by rate counsel appointed to represent the public,1 challenges the validity of two orders entered respectively on December 13 and December 20, 1973, by the New Jersey Board of Public Utility Commissioners (hereafter "PUC" or "the Board"), under PUC Docket No. 732-134. The December 13 order would authorize a public utility to install in its tariff schedule a "Comprehensive...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases