Per Curiam.
Concededly, the factual question before the board was the price per ton that taxpayer paid for asphalt purchased during the audit period. The board, upon remand, found such price to be as claimed by taxpayer, thus granting the claim for refund of an assessment which was based upon the higher purchase price found by the commissioner.
In support of the ultimate issue of whether the board's decision was unreasonable or unlawful, the commissioner...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
