SPRINGS v. SPRINGS

No. 7526DC78.

214 S.E.2d 311 (1975)

25 N.C. App. 615

Margie E. SPRINGS v. Winborne F. SPRINGS.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

May 7, 1975.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lila Bellar, Charlotte, for plaintiff appellant.

Harkey, Faggart, Coira & Fletcher, by Francis M. Fletcher, Jr., and Philip D. Lambeth, Charlotte, for defendant appellee.


BRITT, Judge.

Plaintiff contends the trial court erred for the reason that the findings of fact and conclusions of law are not supported by the evidence presented at the hearing, and there was not sufficient showing of changed conditions to justify the reduction in child support payments. We find no merit in the contention.

We deem it unnecessary to review all of the evidence presented at the hearing or to enumerate the findings of fact and conclusions of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases