TAKIFF, J., July 31, 1975.
Presently before the court are cross motions; one by plaintiff for judgment on the pleadings and the second being plaintiff's preliminary objections to defendant's counterclaim. The seeming paradox suggested by inconsistent motions filed by plaintiff is partially explained by the chronology. The motion for judgment was filed with the motion court on February 7, 1975, the counterclaim was filed with the
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.