1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 45 Cal.App.3d
  5. 45 Cal.App.3d 464 (1975)
 

RIDDICK v. JIM HAY CO.

Docket No. 1925.

45 Cal.App.3d 464 (1975)

119 Cal. Rptr. 546

ROBERT RIDDICK, a Minor, etc., Plaintiff and Appellant, v. JIM HAY COMPANY et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, Fifth District.

February 20, 1975.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Chain, Younger, Cooney, Jameson, Lemucchi & Busacca, Chain, Jameson, Lemucchi & Busacca and Timothy Lemucchi for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Borton, Petrini, Conron, Wetteroth, Hitchcock, Borton, Petrini & Conron, Werdel & Kuhs and George F. Martin for Defendants and Respondents.

OPINION

THOMPSON, J.*

Plaintiff appeals from the judgment entered on a jury verdict in favor of defendants and from the denial of a motion for a new trial; the latter order is not appealable and is dismissed. (Rodriguez v. Barnett, 52 Cal.2d 154, 156 [338 P.2d 907].)

The major portion of the facts in this action...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases