MILLER v. MILLER

No. 450.

67 Wis.2d 435 (1975)

227 N. W. 2d 626

MILLER (Patricia) now Steiner, Appellant, v. MILLER (Roger), Respondent.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

Decided March 28, 1975.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there were briefs by Paul C. Gartzke and Bieberstein, Cooper, Bruemmer, Gartzke & Hanson, all of Madison, and oral argument by Paul C. Gartzke.

For the respondent there was a brief by William D. Harvey and Wheeler, VanSickle & Anderson, all of Madison, and oral argument by Mr. Harvey.


BEILFUSS, J.

We deem the issues to be:

1. Is the respondent estopped from asserting that his duty of support as to each of his sons terminated when each son attains the age of eighteen, the legal age of majority, in view of the stipulation entered into between the parties?

2. Did the trial court abuse its discretion in refusing to require the respondent to pay the college or university expenses of his sons...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases