1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ariz.
  4. 23 Ariz.
  5. 23 Ariz. App. 477 (1975)
 

ROE v. ARIZONA BOARD OF REGENTS

No. 2 CA-CIV 1834.

23 Ariz. App. 477 (1975)

534 P.2d 285

Jane ROE, for herself and as a class for all those similarly situated, Appellant, v. ARIZONA BOARD OF REGENTS, a body corporate, and Bruce E. Babbitt, Attorney General of the State of Arizona, Appellees.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 2.

Rehearing Denied May 20, 1975.

Review Granted June 24, 1975.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Pollock & Fisher, by Elaine S. Pollock and Barbara E. Fisher, Tucson, Arizona Public Law Advocates, by Barbara E. Fisher, Tucson, for appellant.

Bruce E. Babbitt, Atty. Gen., by John S. O'Dowd, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tucson, for appellees.

OPINION

HOWARD, Chief Judge.

Appellant filed this class action in superior court alleging that the State of Arizona unconstitutionally denied her right to have an abortion. She later filed a motion for partial summary judgment declaring A.R.S. § 15-730 unconstitutional and a motion that the action be maintained as a class action. Appellees also filed a motion for summary judgment. This appeal followed the trial court's granting of appellees' motion for...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases