Per Curiam.
In his complaint for a writ of mandamus, appellant avers that the provisions of R. C. 731.32, supra, and 731.29 had been complied with; that he had filed "the necessary documents" with both appellees; and that both appellees had signed, on June 13, 1974, a receipt for a "verification copy of the proposed ordinance."
However, construing the evidence of record most strongly in favor of appellant discloses that Mr. Bry prepared a
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
