1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 67 N.J.
  5. 67 N.J. 427 (1975)
 

KNOBLE v. WATERFRONT COMM. OF N.Y. HARBOR

67 N.J. 427 (1975)

341 A.2d 593

JOHN J. KNOBLE AND SERGIO INTRONA, RESPONDENTS, v. WATERFRONT COMMISSION OF NEW YORK HARBOR, APPELLANT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided June 10, 1975.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Gerald P. Lally argued the cause for appellant (Mr. Irving Malchman, of the New York Bar, and Mr. Robert A. Pin, on the brief; Mr. Charles J. Harrington, Jr., General Counsel and Attorney for the Waterfront Commission of New York Harbor, attorney).

Mr. John P. Croake argued the cause for respondents (Mr. Joseph R. McMahon and Mr. Croake, of counsel; Mr. Wayne J. Positan, on the brief; Messrs. Lum, Biunno & Tompkins, attorneys).

The opinion of the Court was delivered by SULLIVAN, J.

This appeal involves the issue whether the action taken by the Waterfront Commission of New York Harbor in revoking the licenses previously issued to John J. Knoble and Sergio Introna as port watchmen (security guards) and port watchmen (pier guards)1 because of their involvement in a payroll padding scheme was unduly severe and therefore arbitrary and unreasonable. The Appellate Division...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases