BROADIE v. STATE

No. State 178.

68 Wis.2d 420 (1975)

228 N. W. 2d 687

BROADIE, Plaintiff in error, v. STATE, Defendant in error.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

Decided May 6, 1975.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the plaintiff in error there was a brief by Laurence E. Norton II, and oral argument by David S. Berman, both of the Legal Aid Society of Milwaukee.

For the defendant in error the cause was argued by E. Michael McCann, Milwaukee county district attorney, with whom on the brief was Bronson C. La Follette, attorney general, and Charles S. Blumenfield, assistant district attorney.


HANLEY, J.

Two issues are presented upon this appeal:

1. Was a sufficient factual basis presented to the lower court for the acceptance of the defendant's negotiated plea of guilty to the amended charge of endangering safety by conduct regardless of life, contrary to sec. 941.30, Stats?

2. Was a manifest injustice established so that defendant should have been allowed to withdraw his plea of guilty?

...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases