PER CURIAM.
Appellant was convicted of robbery. Of the five points raised on appeal, only the first four are properly before us and we conclude that none of them demonstrate reversible error. The fifth point attacks the constitutionality of Section 39.02(5)(c), F.S. (1973). The issue of the constitutionality of this statute was not raised and directly passed upon by the trial court and as such is precluded from consideration by this court. State v. McInnes,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.