1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 391 F.Supp.
  5. 391 F.Supp. 91 (1975)
 

HOGGE v. HEDRICK

Civ. A. No. 74-0488-R.

391 F.Supp. 91 (1975)

James Robert HOGGE et al. v. Wilmer J. HEDRICK et al.

United States District Court, E. D. Virginia, Richmond Division.

On Motion to Partially Vacate January 14, 1975.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael Morchower, Ott, Morchower, Thompson & McMullan, Richmond, Va., for plaintiffs.

William G. Broaddus, County Atty., Timothy Oakman, Asst. County Atty., County of Henrico, Richmond, Va., for defendants.

R. Michael Smith, Norfolk, Va., for intervening plaintiff.

MEMORANDUM

MERHIGE, District Judge.

This action, under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and the First, Fourth, Ninth and Fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution, challenging the validity of Chapter 17, Articles I-IX, of the Code of the County of Henrico, Virginia, which regulates the operation of and the conduct of employees at massage parlors located within the county, is before the Court on plaintiffs' motion for a preliminary injunction. Plaintiffs, whose places...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases