BLOUNT v. TYNDALL

No. 753SC92.

214 S.E.2d 265 (1975)

25 N.C. App. 559

William Oscar BLOUNT, Administrator of the Estate of Pearlie Mae Blount, v. Eddie Howard TYNDALL and Dewey Bros., Inc. William O. BLOUNT v. Eddie Howard TYNDALL and Dewey Bros., Inc.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

May 7, 1975.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James, Hite, Cavendish & Blount by Robert D. Rouse, III, Greenville, for plaintiffs.

Gaylord & Singleton by Danny D. McNally, Greenville, for defendants.


BROCK, Chief Judge.

Plaintiffs assign as error that the instructions to the jury by the trial court were so ambiguous and confusing that they caused the jury to return verdicts which plaintiffs contend are inconsistent. Specifically plaintiffs except to the following language reported to have been used by the trial court in its instructions:

"In each action the defendant has filed what is called a counterclaim, and it is also suing the plaintiff in each action...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases