1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 406 F.Supp.
  5. 406 F.Supp. 52 (1975)
 

SMITHKLINE CORPORATION v. STERLING DRUG, INC.

Civ. A. No. 74-266.

406 F.Supp. 52 (1975)

SMITHKLINE CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. STERLING DRUG, INC., Defendant.

United States District Court, D. Delaware.

July 9, 1975.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard F. Corroon, of Potter, Anderson & Corroon, Wilmington, Del., of counsel; George J. Harding, 3rd, of Smith, Harding, Early & Follmer, Philadelphia, Pa., William S. Rawls, of Ballard, Spahr, Andrews & Ingersoll, Alan D. Lourie, Philadelphia, Pa., for plaintiff.

Arthur G. Connolly, Jr., of Connolly, Bove & Lodge, Wilmington, Del., of counsel; Thomas F. Reddy, Jr., Clyde C. Metzger, Robert J. Kadel, and Berj A. Terzian, of Pennie & Edmonds, New York City, for defendant.

OPINION

MURRAY M. SCHWARTZ, District Judge.

FACTS

This dispute arises from defendant Sterling Drug, Inc.'s ("Sterling") motion to transfer this litigation, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a),1 to the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. Before reaching the legal issues raised by plaintiff SmithKline Corporation's ("SmithKline") opposition to Sterling's motion, it is necessary to briefly describe the facts which spawned...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases