LONG v. MILWAUKEE & SUBURBAN TRANSPORT CORP.

No. 409.

67 Wis.2d 384 (1975)

227 N. W. 2d 67

LONG and another, Appellants, v. MILWAUKEE & SUBURBAN TRANSPORT CORPORATION and another, Respondents.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

Decided March 28, 1975.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellants there was a brief and oral argument by S. A. Schapiro of Milwaukee.

For the respondents there was a brief by Kivett & Kasdorf, attorneys, and Russell M. Ware of counsel, all of Milwaukee, and oral argument by Mr. Ware.


BEILFUSS, J.

The parties agree that the notes or memoranda involved here are lawyer's work product and are shielded from discovery in the first instance. Such a conclusion is inescapable in light of this court's decision in State ex rel. Dudek v. Circuit Court (1967), 34 Wis.2d 559, 589, 150 N.W.2d 387:

". . . we conclude that a lawyer's work product consists of the information he has assembled and the mental impressions...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases