1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 51 Cal.App.3d
  5. 51 Cal.App.3d 400 (1975)
 

RUNNING FENCE CORP. v. SUPERIOR COURT

Docket No. 37246.

51 Cal.App.3d 400 (1975)

124 Cal. Rptr. 339

RUNNING FENCE CORPORATION, Petitioner, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SONOMA COUNTY, Respondent; COMMITTEE TO STOP THE RUNNING FENCE et al., Real Parties in Interest.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division One.

September 17, 1975.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Spridgen, Barrett, Achor, Luckhardt, Anderson & James, Edwin C. Anderson, Jr., John O'Brien, Paul Kayfetz, Howard, Prim, Rice,

Nemerovski, Canady & Pollak, Howard N. Nemerovski, Jerome B. Falk, Jr., Stephen M. Tennis and Fred H. Altshuler for Petitioner.

No appearance for Respondent.

Thomas A. Haeuser for Real Parties in Interest.

OPINION

SIMS, J.

By petition filed with this court petitioner, the successful applicant for a use permit to construct "the Christo Running Fence, a specialty Fence Art Project" and to display it for a period of 14 days, seeks a writ to restrain the respondent court from taking any further proceedings in an action brought by real parties in interest in which the respondent court orally ordered the issuance of a peremptory writ of mandate...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases