1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 48 Cal.App.3d
  5. 48 Cal.App.3d 385 (1975)
 

WINZLER & KELLY v. SUPERIOR COURT

Docket No. 35824.

48 Cal.App.3d 385 (1975)

122 Cal. Rptr. 259

WINZLER & KELLY et al., Petitioners, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF HUMBOLDT COUNTY; Respondent; LELAND LIPSCOMB et al., Real Parties in Interest.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division One.

May 22, 1975.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Jones & Wilson and George W. Coleman for Petitioners.

No appearance for Respondent.

Dunn, Phelps & Mills and Carlos Bea for Real Parties in Interest.

OPINION

MOLINARI, P.J.

Petitioners Winzler & Kelly, a corporation, and John Winzler, individually, seek a writ of mandate compelling respondent court to grant any or all of the following of petitioners' motions: Motion to compel execution, acknowledgment and filing of satisfaction of judgment or for an order ordering the entry of satisfaction of judgment without acknowledgment of satisfaction; motion to dismiss; motion for summary...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases