The tenant herein successfully defended these nonpayment summary proceedings upon the principal contention that the landlord failed to acquire a certificate of occupancy, in violation of sections 301 and 302 of the Multiple Dwelling Law. Assuming arguendo that the subject premises constitute a multiple dwelling (see Multiple Dwelling Law, § 4, subd 7; Matter of Herzog v Thompson,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
COULSTON v. TELISCOPE PRODS
85 Misc.2d 339 (1975)
Gerald F. Coulston, as Attorney for Jerome F. Katz, Appellant-Respondent, v. Teliscope Productions, Ltd., Respondent-Appellant.
Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
December 17, 1975
December 17, 1975
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Luster, Gaier & Luster, P. C. (
Concur: FRANK, J. P., HUGHES and FINE, JJ.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.