FORREST PASCHAL MACHINERY CO. v. MILHOLEN

Nos. 7518SC454 and 7518SC582.

220 S.E.2d 190 (1975)

27 N.C. App. 678

FORREST PASCHAL MACHINERY COMPANY v. Harold J. MILHOLEN et al.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

December 17, 1975.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Brooks, Pierce, McLendon, Humphrey & Leonard by C. T. Leonard, Jr., and John L. Sarratt, Greensboro, for plaintiff.

Smith, Moore, Smith, Schell & Hunter by Stephen P. Milliken, Richard W. Ellis and H. Miles Foy, III, Greensboro, for defendants.


MORRIS, Judge.

Although both plaintiff and defendants docketed separate records and filed briefs with respect to the questions presented by each of the appeals, we deem it practical to address all questions raised in each appeal in one opinion.

The order from which defendants and plaintiff appeal restrains defendant from competing with plaintiff pending trial of the cause on its merits, and is, therefore, interlocutory. Generally, an appeal from an interlocutory...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases