1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Pa.Super.
  4. 233 Pa.Super.
  5. 233 Pa.Super. 175 (1975)
 

FRAMLAU CORP. v. KLING et al.

233 Pa.Super. 175 (1975)

Framlau Corporation, Appellant, v. Kling et al.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

March 31, 1975.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jon C. Sirlin, with him Stephen R. Bolden, and Fell, Spalding, Goff & Rubin, for appellant.

Arthur E. Newbold, III, with him Frank J. Ferro, and Dechert, Price & Rhoads, for appellees.

Before WATKINS, P.J., JACOBS, HOFFMAN, CERCONE, PRICE, and SPAETH, JJ. (VAN DER VOORT, J., absent).

OPINION BY HOFFMAN, J., March 31, 1975:

The appellant contends that the trial court erroneously granted the appellee's motion for summary judgment under Rule 1035, Pa. R.C.P. The lower court ruled that appellant's cause of action was barred by the statute of limitations.

In June, 1963, appellee, Vincent G. Kling, a noted Philadelphia-based architect1 (hereinafter "Architect"), entered into an agreement with the Upper Dublin School...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases