STATE v. CLAY

No. 7515SC438.

218 S.E.2d 187 (1975)

27 N.C. App. 118

STATE of North Carolina v. Maudie Mae CLAY.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Discretionary Review Denied December 2, 1975.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Atty. Gen. Rufus L. Edmisten by Asst. Atty. Gen. Charles R. Hassell, Jr., Raleigh, for the State.

Long, Ridge & Long by Daniel H. Monroe, Jr., Graham, for defendant.


Discretionary Review Denied by Supreme Court December 2, 1975.

BROCK, Chief Judge.

Defendant's assignments of error Nos. I, II, and III object, to the trial court's ruling on defendant's objections to testimony. These assignments of error are feckless and merit no discussion.

Defendant's assignment of error No. IV objects to the admission of hearsay testimony. Prosecution witness Murdock was permitted to state that defense witness Gattis told him defendant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases