BOARD OF TRANSP. v. WILDER

No. 759SC654.

220 S.E.2d 183 (1975)

28 N.C. App. 105

BOARD OF TRANSPORTATION, Substitute-Plaintiff, v. Hubert C. WILDER and wife, Jeannette P. Wilder, Defendants.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

December 17, 1975.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Atty. Gen., Rufus L. Edmisten by Asst. Atty. Gen., William F. Briley, Raleigh, for the State.

Charles M. Davis and Hill Yarborough, Louisburg, for defendants-appellants.


BRITT, Judge.

First, defendants contend that the trial judge committed prejudicial error in various remarks which he directed to their counsel in the presence of the jury. The contention has merit.

The remarks complained of were made during the course of Defense Attorney Yarborough's cross-examination of plaintiff's witness Willard King. The first of these was the directive for counsel to "quit interrupting him and let him answer your question". Shortly thereafter...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases