1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 212 S.E.2d
  5. 212 S.E.2d 190 (1975)
 

FREEMAN v. STURDIVANT DEVELOPMENT COMPANY

No. 7425SC985.

212 S.E.2d 190 (1975)

25 N.C. App. 56

James F. FREEMAN v. STURDIVANT DEVELOPMENT COMPANY and Foster-Sturdivant Company, Inc.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

March 5, 1975.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Tate, Weathers & Young by E. Murray Tate, Jr., Hickory, for plaintiff-appellant.

Vannoy, Moore & Colvard by J. Gary Vannoy, North Wilkesboro, for defendants-appellants.

ARNOLD, Judge.

APPEAL OF DEFENDANTS

Defendants initially contend that the trial court erred in denying their motion for summary judgment. As movants under Rule 56 they had the burden of establishing the lack of a triable issue of fact. Houck v. Overcash, 282 N.C. 623, 193 S.E.2d 905 (1973); Singleton v. Stewart, 280 N.C. 460, 186 S.E.2d 400...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases