STOLZ, Judge.
The record in this case reveals issues of fact which should be determined by a jury. Consequently, the trial judge did not err in denying the appellant's motion for summary judgment.
This case is materially different from Sutker v. Penn. Ins. Co., 115 Ga.App. 648 (155 S.E.2d 694). In Sutker, the complaint alleged that the named individual agent was "the duly authorized agent, employee, and servant of the insurance company acting...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
