DETROIT BD. OF. ED. v. MICHIGAN BELL TELEPHONE CO.

Docket No. 55904, (Calendar No. 15).

395 Mich. 1 (1975)

232 N.W.2d 633

BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE SCHOOL DISTRICT OF THE CITY OF DETROIT v. MICHIGAN BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY

Supreme Court of Michigan.

Decided September 8, 1975.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Riley & Roumell (by George T. Roumell, Jr., Thomas M.J. Hathaway and John F. Brady), for plaintiff.

Jack H. Shuler, Donald C. Brown, Werner M. Killen and Butzel, Long, Gust, Klein & VanZile (John L. Vanker, of counsel), for defendant Michigan Bell Telephone Company.

Fischer, Franklin & Ford (by George Hogg, Jr. and Francis E. Bentley), for defendant The Detroit Edison Company.


Decided September 8, 1975. Rehearing denied.

PER CURIAM:

In 1962, the Detroit Board of Education filed a petition in the circuit court to vacate certain plats and an alley in order to facilitate construction of additions to a school. Defendants Michigan Bell Telephone Company and The Detroit Edison Company answered the board's petition claiming that under the provisions of the plat act they were entitled to retain easements

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases