1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 48 Cal.App.3d
  5. 48 Cal.App.3d 343 (1975)
 

RICHMOND REDEVELOPMENT AGCY. v. W. TITLE GUARANTY

Docket No. 34255.

48 Cal.App.3d 343 (1975)

122 Cal. Rptr. 434

RICHMOND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. WESTERN TITLE GUARANTY COMPANY et al., Defendants and Appellants.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division One.

April 28, 1975.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Phillip M. Millspaugh for Defendants and Appellants.

Fitzgerald & Johnson and Herman H. Fitzgerald for Plaintiff and Respondent.

OPINION

LAZARUS, J.*

Respondent public agency commenced this proceeding in eminent domain to acquire title to the subject property in the City of Richmond for redevelopment purposes on June 5, 1972. In the original action, the defendants were Western Title Guaranty Company, Contra Costa County Division; Nubert "Babe" Dias; E.L. McFarland; the Sumitomo Bank of California; and Does One to Twenty.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases