WIEDLE v. REMMEL

No. 74-464.

42 Ohio St. 2d 335 (1975)

WIEDLE, EXE., APPELLEE, v. REMMEL, APPELLANT.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided May 21, 1975.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Messrs. Catri, Howells, Wagner & Kellam and Mr. John F. Kirwan, for appellee.

Flynn, Py & Kruse Co., L. P. A., and Mr. Raymond N. Watts, for appellant.


CORRIGAN, J.

Appellant propounds three propositions of law for this court's consideration.

Appellant maintains, in his first proposition of law, that decedent was guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law, where, as here, he stepped upon a public highway outside a municipal corporation in daylight with an approaching vehicle in clear view and was thereafter struck by such vehicle. We disagree.

Appellant relies upon R. C. 4511.49, which requires...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases