CAMMEL v. STATE FARM INS.

No. 43683.

86 Wn.2d 264 (1975)

543 P.2d 634

JAMES H. CAMMEL, Respondent, v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant.

The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

December 18, 1975.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Nashem, Prediletto, Brooks & Schussler and Don W. Schussler, for appellant.

David H. Putney (of Halverson, Applegate, McDonald, Bond, Grahn, Wiehl, Almon & Putney), for respondent.


HOROWITZ, J.

This case considers the amount of uninsured motorist coverage available to a husband and wife insured on three separate automobile insurance liability policies issued to them on three separate vehicles by one insurer. The question presented is the meaning and the validity of the pro rata clause of the "Other Insurance" exclusion, which applies to the uninsured motorist coverage contained in each policy.

The facts are these. During their lifetimes...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases