PER CURIAM.
These are consolidated appeals from two judgments and sentences for the crime of escape. Appellant was charged by separate informations with two separate escapes, to each of which he pled nolo contendere. The pleas were accepted by the court without first determining on the record that there was a factual basis for the pleas contrary to Rule 3.170(j), F.R.Cr.P. Our previous ruling in Estes v. State, Fla.App. (1st),
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.