ORWICK v. BELSHAN

No. 44177.

231 N.W.2d 90 (1975)

Allen ORWICK, Respondent, v. Douglas BELSHAN, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

June 13, 1975.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ross M. Muir, Rochester, for appellant.

Leighton, Meany, Cotter & Enger and Terence L. Meany, Austin, for respondent.

Heard before KELLY, SCOTT, and McRAE, JJ., and considered and decided by the court en banc.


SCOTT, Justice.

Defendant appeals from an order denying his motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or, in the alternative, for a new trial. His argument, both orally and by brief, is directed solely to the question of whether a new trial should be granted. The issues raised by defendant can be categorized generally as (1) whether an inconsistency in the answers to questions posed in the special verdict requires a new trial; (2) whether the trial court erred...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases