CLAYTON v. FREEHOLD TP. BD. OF EDUCATION


67 N.J. 249 (1975)

337 A.2d 361

SCOTT T. CLAYTON, AN INFANT BY HIS GUARDIAN AD LITEM, CURTIS CLAYTON, AND CURTIS CLAYTON, INDIVIDUALLY, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. FREEHOLD TOWNSHIP BOARD OF EDUCATION, WILLIAM McCROWHAN AND CLAUDIO LOPEZ, AN INFANT BY HIS GUARDIAN AD LITEM, J.R. LOPEZ, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided April 22, 1975.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Michael D. Schottland argued the cause for the plaintiffs-appellants (Messrs. Chamlin, Schottland & Rosen, attorneys).

Mr. Richard A. Amdur argued the cause for the defendants-respondents (Hanlon, Amdur & Hanlon, attorneys).

Mr. Bernard F. Boglioli argued the cause for defendants-respondents Freehold Township Board of Education and William McCrowhan.


The opinion of the Court was delivered by CONFORD, P.J.A.D., Temporarily Assigned.

The facts and circumstances of this case are adequately stated in the reported opinion of the Appellate Division and need not be repeated here. Suffice it to say that plaintiffs suffered an adverse jury verdict in an action to recover damages for injuries sustained by the infant plaintiff, when, as a member of an elementary school gym class...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases