In this personal injury action based on a dog bite incurred by the infant plaintiff, the jury returned a verdict of no cause for action in favor of defendants-respondents Castronova, owners of the dog. The six-year-old infant Christopher DiGrazia (Christopher) and his father, Philip DiGrazia, appeal on the grounds that their motion for a directed verdict should have been granted, that the verdict
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
DiGRAZIA v. CASTRONOVA
48 A.D.2d 249 (1975)
Christopher DiGrazia, an Infant by His Parent and Natural Guardian Philip DiGrazia, et al., Appellants, v. Anthony J. Castronova et al., Respondents
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Fourth Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
June 6, 1975
June 6, 1975
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Woods, Oviatt, Gilman, Sturman & Clarke (
Lines, Wilkens, Osborn & Beck (
MARSH, P. J., and CARDAMONE, J., concur with GOLDMAN, J.; MOULE, J., dissents and votes to affirm the judgment in an opinion in which WITMER, J., concurs.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Fourth Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
