1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 46 Cal.App.3d
  5. 46 Cal.App.3d 237 (1975)
 

BOOKASTA v. HARTFORD ACC. & INDEM. CO.

Docket No. 44361.

46 Cal.App.3d 237 (1975)

120 Cal. Rptr. 229

E.H. BOOKASTA, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. HARTFORD ACCIDENT AND INDEMNITY COMPANY, Defendant and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Two.

March 19, 1975.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Fierstein, Sturman & Schulman and Harvey Fierstein for Plaintiff and Appellant.

McCormick & Williams and Harold Rubins for Defendant and Respondent.

OPINION

COMPTON, J.

Does the holding of Randone v. Appellate Department, 5 Cal.3d 536 [96 Cal.Rptr. 709, 488 P.2d 13], that Code of Civil Procedure section 537.1 (prejudgment attachment) is unconstitutional, render an undertaking filed in support of a prejudgment attachment prior to that decision void and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases