STATE v. AHUMADA

No. 2 CA-CR 646.

25 Ariz. App. 247 (1975)

542 P.2d 828

The STATE of Arizona, Appellee, v. Arnold AHUMADA, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 2.

Review Denied February 3, 1976.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bruce E. Babbitt, Atty. Gen., by Charles E. Buri, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tucson, for appellee.

John M. Neis, Pima County Public Defender, by Kenneth J. Peasley, Asst. Public Defender, Tucson, for appellant.


OPINION

HOWARD, Chief Judge.

Appellant was found guilty by a jury of unlawful sale of narcotics in violation of A.R.S. Sec. 36-1002.02 and was sentenced to serve not less than five years nor more than five years and one day. Two points are raised on appeal.

The first alleged error concerns the denial by the trial court of appellant's motion for a continuance. On the first day of trial, April 15, 1975, the court terminated the proceedings immediately...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases