SCHNEIDER v. WARNER

No. 414.

69 Wis.2d 194 (1975)

230 N.W.2d 728

SCHNEIDER and wife, Appellants, v. WARNER and husband, Respondents.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

Decided June 30, 1975.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellants the cause was submitted on the briefs of Walter M. Tammi and Schneider & Tammi, all of Milwaukee; and for the respondents the cause was submitted on the brief of Quarles & Brady of Milwaukee, attorneys, and Peter W. Bunde, David E. Jarvis and Larry J. Jost, all of Milwaukee, of counsel.


Submitted under sec. (Rule) 251.54 February 5, 1975.

HEFFERNAN, J.

The evidence supports the findings of fact made by the trial court. Therefore, the question in this case is whether the court correctly invoked the rule of Ochiltree v. Kaiser (1963), 20 Wis.2d 191, 121 N.W.2d 890, that time may be made of the essence after breach of a contract for the sale of land by reasonable notice to the party in default to...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases