RICHLAND TRUST CO. v. BECVAR

No. 74-982.

44 Ohio St. 2d 219 (1975)

RICHLAND TRUST CO., EXR., ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. BECVAR ET AL.; DOWD, APPELLEE.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided December 31, 1975.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Robert H. Benzin, for appellant Richland Trust Co., Exr.

Messrs. Knell & Freehafer and Mr. A. Douglas Freehafer, for appellants Frederick Hummel and others.

Mr. Loyal F. Luikart, Jr., for appellee.


O'NEILL, C. J.

In the instant cause this court is called upon to review the construction placed upon the sentence "[o]ne-seventh (1/7th) to Louise Hummel, per stirpes" in the residuary clause of the will of M. Elizabeth Hummel by the Court of Appeals.

The function of the court in a will construction case is to determine and apply the testatrix's intention, as expressed in the language of the whole will, read...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases