MATTER OF ZIVKOVIC v. ZIVKOVIC


36 N.Y.2d 216 (1975)

In the Matter of Hazel Zivkovic, Respondent, v. Radomir Zivkovic, Appellant. In the Matter of Mildred A. Greise, Appellant, v. Fred C. Greise, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Decided March 19, 1975.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Deyan Ranko Brashich and Edith Blumberg for appellant in the first above-entitled proceeding.

Irving Rader for respondent in the first above-entitled proceeding.

Adrian P. Burke, Corporation Counsel (L. Kevin Sheridan and Nina G. Goldstein of counsel), pro se, amicus curiae in the first above-entitled proceeding.

Adrian P. Burke, Corporation Counsel (Nina G. Goldstein and L. Kevin Sheridan of counsel), for appellant in the second above-entitled proceeding.

Edith Blumberg and Deyan Ranko Brashich for respondent in the second above-entitled proceeding.

Chief Judge BREITEL and Judges GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and COOKE concur.


JASEN, J.

The Family Court Act (§ 427, subd. [c]) provides that in a "proper case" the summons in a proceeding for support may be served by mail. It is the practice, we are advised, of the Family Court in the City of New York routinely to serve by mail all summonses in support proceedings. Each of the husband respondents in the proceedings now before the court was so served. The propriety of such service...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases